🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.